Medical Negligence Lawyers Help Improve the Standards of Australia’s Medical Profession

Victims of medical negligence can feel like docors are constantly getting away with poor professionalism but medical negligence cases and lawyers are actually helping to create new medical standards as well as improve existing ones, according to speakers at a recent conference in Sydney.

medical negligence

 Image sourced from Shutterstock

There’s an unfair and untrue belief that medical negligence cases are forcing doctors to now act in a defensive manner, so as to best protect themselves from any future lawsuits, without actually treating the patient as effectively as they could. In reality, legal cases in the medical world are often published in well-read medical journals meaning that there’s more discussion and awareness of what acceptable practice is. This discussion has led to improvements in the quality of care patients are receiving.

Part of this improvement in the quality of care provided for patients is that doctors are more aware of the importance of discussing with and getting patients more involved with their own health care. These discussions also included better explanation and counselling about side-effects and risks of treatments. Previously, many doctors had felt too busy to become engaged with each individual patient to this level, including making detailed histories, but the rise of medical negligence cases has made it apparent to doctors that this time needs to be made if they wish to continue in the profession.

Detailed histories are highly crucial in medical cases, particularly those that could be seen as negligent, as keeping documents that including patient histories, diagnoses, other potential diagnoses (including rare but dangerous conditions), management plans and a follow-up plan as they are in fact Medicare consultation requirements. Already a doctor’s case looks shaky if they are shown to not be following required procedures, but these documents are what form the basis for a doctor’s defense.

Though medical negligence is extremely horrible, a successful medical negligence case can definitely have far-reaching consequences to how the Australian medical world operates. To find out more about medical negligence take a look at Obesity and Medical Negligence: Where’s the Line?.

Obvious Risk: A Man Claims Compensation After Falling Down a Stairwell At a Sydney Ice Rink

Regardless of whether a person is clumsy or has a skewed view of their own skills there are times in life when accidents and injuries happen that could be, in a court of law, deemed a result of obvious risk. Take, for instance, the case of Moor v Liverpool Catholic Club, an ice skating rink in Sydney where Moor’s lawyer argued that he was entitled to compensation for his injuries.

Compensation

Image sourced from Shutterstock

The basic facts of the questioned incident are that Moor was wearing a pair of ice skating boots as he was about to begin skating. As Moor began to descend the stairs down to the ice rink he lost his footing and fell, fracturing his right ankle. The question that was then raised was is falling an obvious or inherent risk that comes with walking down stairs in ice skating boots.

When it came to working out whether walking down those stairs in ice skating boots was an obvious risk it was brought to the court’s attention that there was no warning or suggestion present from the actual club that doing such a thing would be dangerous. It was furthered argued that the fall wasn’t an obvious risk because CCTV footage showed that Moor wasn’t acting in a way that would’ve lead to a fall or injury, i.e. he was carefully walking down the stairs.

It might seem like an obvious risk to someone else that walking down a flight of stairs in a pair of shoes that aren’t made for walking could easily end badly, but the key to Moor receiving compensation was that the club hadn’t provided any warning or information to suggest that such a practice was dangerous. In the end, Moor received over $100,000 in compensation.

For information on achieving a successful compensation claim, see Being Honest to Get the Best Results: What You Need to Know About Workers Compensation.

Sydney Workers May Not Receive Compensation for PTSD

With over a100,0000 peopleworking in Sydney a psychiatric injury can be the undoing for any worker, whether it’s from being involved in a harrowing robbery to working the front line as a police officer. The definition of worker’s compensation covers all types of injuries, not just the ones you can see like a broken leg, so obviously a matter like PTSD doesn’t need a lawyer to get a worker’s compensation claim fulfilled, does it?

Compensation

Image sourced from Shutterstock

Joe Noonan is a former police officer suffering from PTSD after a series of very distressing incidents during the course of his time as a detective. He had a shotgun pointed at him in a situation where he genuinely feared for his life, he saw five deaths in one shift, he was shot at at close range, he was holding a colleague in his arms when they died of a gunshot to the head, along with many other situations that were either extremely distressing or that left him fearing for his life. If anyone’s entitled to compensation, it’d be Noonan, wouldn’t it?

Not so according to the County Court of Victoria and the Victorian WorkCover Authority. To receive compensation Noonan’s injuries would have to be classed as serious. Noonan argued that as a result of his job he suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder as well as depression, anxiety, panic disorder and nervousness, which all sounds like quite a handful. The judge found that Noonan’s symptoms couldn’t be considered severe enough to receive compensation as they didn’t meet the requirements of the severe injury test. But why?

The reason was that Noonan was quite a high-functioning person. His life now is quite good and he’s quite productive, which is what really what undid his case, though there is evidence that his experiences do still affect his life but it still wasn’t enough for the judge. Noonan attends to appeal this decision.

If you’d like to read more about worker’s compensation, check out How Facebook Can Kill Your Worker’s Compensation Claim.

Man Wants Compensation for Millions Lost Gambling Template

There are plenty of places to gamble in Sydney but surely the people who choose to enter them and gamble are entirely responsible for any and all the money they lose? Is it just rubbish to try and argue that a casino made you lose all your money and get compensation for it? Whatever you think, one man tried to do exactly that.

Compensation

Image sourced from Shutterstock

Harry Kakavas went to the High Court to argue that Crown Casino victimised him and made him lose 20 million dollars over a year. He claimed that the casino knew he had a gambling problem and that they offered him incentives to go there, including the use of a private jet.

Kakavas could be classed as a high-roller, a businessman on the Gold Coast who would often make a turnover of about one and a half billion dollars. The life blood of casinos are high-rollers and so plenty of incentives are used to encourage them to come back time after time. Not only was Kakavas given private jet rides to take him from the Gold Coast to Crown Casino in Melbourne, he was also given free luxury accommodation, gift boxes of cash and one and a half million dollars in credit. That’s certainly a lot to just get one man down to play at the tables.

Originally he tried to argue a negligence claim against the casino but when that looked like it would fail he changed his argument to one regarding poor treatment of a consumer by breaching consumer laws. However, from Crown’s side they didn’t do anything wrong. They may have allegedly been aware of Kakavas gambling problem and history of law proceedings against other casinos but he did present to the casino each time as a man who could afford to gamble and, more importantly, afford to lose large amounts of money. He would often come to the casino and place initial deposits of up to a million dollars.

As a result of this appearance of capability, the High Court decided that there was not enough premeditated or predatory behaviour to suggest that Crown Casino had actually gone out of its way to get such a large sum of money off Kakavas. To be realistic, he was the one accepting the incentives and deciding to continue to gamble.

It’s not just casinos that get drawn into gambling-related compensation cases, have a read of A Gamble on Love: The Not So Happily Married Couple Could Find Themselves in Family Court if They Win Big on Lotto to find out more.

Obesity and Medical Negligence – Where’s the Line? | BPC Lawyers Blog

Almost one quarter of Australians are overweight but you wouldn’t blame their doctor for it, would you? Surely obesity is an issue for the individual and not something that a medical negligence lawyer needs to become involved with. Surprisingly, one Sydney doctor recently faced charges of medical negligence because of the obesity of his patient.

Medical Negligence

Image sourced from Shutterstock

Late last year, a court awarded Mr Luis Almario $350,000 as a payout in a medical negligence case. According to Almario his GP, Dr Varipatis, had failed in his duty of care for him by not referring him to bariatric surgeon who could perform a lap-band surgery or weight loss clinic to reduce his weight.

When Almario started seeing his GP in 1997 he already weighed over 120kg, well above what the average man should. But it’s not just the man’s weight that the case is concerned with.

When Almario started seeing Dr Varipatis he had a form of liver disease. Over the course of their patient-doctor relationship this liver disease progressed to cirrhosis, liver failure and then liver cancer.

The theory was that if the doctor had referred Almario to some form of weight loss treatment he wouldn’t have experienced liver failure.

However, Dr Varipatis appealed the decision and was successful. A three-judge panel decided that the initial ruling was nonsense and that a doctor’s duty of care only extends to discussing weight-loss options with a patient.

They believed that if he’d referred Almario to a weight-loss clinic it wouldn’t have been successful, as it really is only the individual who can make the decision and commitment to lose weight.

Questions were also raised as to the pointlessness of trying to convince Almario to lose weight.

Medical negligence can certainly cover some tricky ground and no two cases may have similar results.

If you’d like to read more about medical negligence and the work of medical negligence lawyers, see Medical Negligence: When It’s Worse Than It Seems.

Additional source:http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/gp-hails-appeal-victory-in-364k-obesity-case

Compensation for Those Injured in Police Chases | BPC Law Blog

It’s hard to ignore the debate that arises every now and again in the media about police chases. There are advocates who believe that if police can’t engage in high-speed pursuits then the entire of Sydney will be swamped with criminals, while others argue that the chases are too dangerous. Whatever side of the fence you are on you can’t deny that if someone were to be injured in a police chase then they should be duly compensated. You don’t have to be a lawyer to figure that one out.

Compensation

Image sourced from Shutterstock

At the start of this year Susan Delaney was awarded more than nine million dollars in compensation after a high-speed pursuit in 2006 left her with brain injuries that have severely affected her ability to function and have a normal life.

The chase lasted 40 kilometres after police noticed that a motorcyclist was a member of the outlaw motorcycle gang Odin’s. This motorcyclist was Delaney’s then-boyfriend and she was sitting on the back of the motorcycle.

The chase only came to an end when the motorcycle crashed, resulting in Delaney’s boyfriend dying.

The main reason it took so long for Delaney to receive compensation was the existence of arguments that suggested that she had in some way contributed to the accident. There were also arguments that asked why she didn’t get off the motorbike at some point before the fatal crash.

However, this also proved to be the crux of the defendant’s argument.

In court Delaney argued that the police hadn’t even realised she was on the motorbike at all during the chase. Perhaps if she’d somehow been taunting or egging on police than she would’ve contributed to the accident but as they were unaware of her presence it could be seen that Delaney was entirely passive in the matter.

Delaney’s entire focus was on staying alive – she hadn’t wanted to enter this chase but had been pulled along into it.

Susan Delaney’s case will prove to be a landmark case in the realm of police chases and contributory negligence. In any other sort of incident she’d simply be seen as being in the wrong place at the wrong time but the circumstances of the case made details and evidence murky to say the least.

If you’re interested in learning more about compensation cases see How Victims Compensation Could Work for You.

Are Medical Boards Too Soft When It Comes to Negligent Doctors? | BPC Law Blog

There are over 500,000 medical professionals working in Australia and with such a huge number you can be sure that there’s at least a small percentage of healthcare workers who aren’t up to scratch. Medical negligence is often only ever talking about in hushed voices and it can be extremely frustrating and upsetting for both victims and their lawyers when the perpetrator is allowed to continue to work or even gets completely away with it.

Medical Negligence

Image sourced from Shutterstock

When a doctor or healthcare professional is accused of being negligent in their duty of providing the utmost of care to their patient the wheels of the review system can turn very slowly indeed. It’s normally only a small percentage of doctors who are complained about, but these doctors are the ones who are complained about all the time. There’s even been estimates that out of all the complaints made about medical professionals in Victoria, three percent of the total number of health workers in state are responsible for more than half of the complaints received, yet these people still continue to work in this industry.

The big problem is when it comes to punishing doctors for cases of medical negligence it’s the fact that to prove medical negligencea supporting argument must also be made by another practicing doctor. In fact in NSW, a medical negligence case cannot begin without this crucial support. Unfortunately the community of medical professionals is well-established from university and beyond and it can be extremely difficult to find a doctor who will support your case within Australia. So what can you do?

In the case of medical negligence, to achieve any sort of improvement in the treatment of victims and the subsequent punishment of offending doctors it’s important that everyone who has suffered speaks up and attempts to get their case to court. There’ve already been successes, for instance, in the case of Dr James Peters who infected 55 women with Hepatitis C, Dr Peters was jailed for 14 years.

If you’re interested in learning more about the prominence of medical negligence take a look at Medical Negligence Claims on the Rise for GPs.